When politicians say, "I support open space", what does that mean? Not much. After all, can you remember ever hearing a politician speak out AGAINST open space?
Politicians are understandably reluctant to take clear, specific positions on most complex issues out of fear of antagonizing potential supporters. When EVERYONE claims to support something associated with complex decisions on land use, development, and the environment, voters should be a little bit suspicious. What do they really mean?
Maybe it is time for a New Age visualization exercise, to get in touch with one's inner self.
When you hear "open space", what comes to mind?
Person A visualizes soccer fields, golf courses and a softball "field of dreams." People drive their cars to this open space for active recreation. This is a bustling, happy, noisy place on weekends, but it requires a fair investment of time and effort for property maintenance.
Person B dreams of the Alaskan wilderness, pure, pristine, untouched by human civilization, utilized by grizzly, salmon, elk and timber wolf, and only the occasional backpacker or wildlife documentary producer. When Person B snaps out of this reverie and returns closer to home, he dreams of local acreage of great beauty, preserved less for human use and more for passive enjoyment. This open space is for admiring, not using. This perspective is held by the many unselfish people who get pleasure and satisfaction just from knowing that beautiful places are protected. (Although of course this view is also conveniently held by nearby property owners will benefit from an increase in their own property values).
Person C fantasizes of an oasis of green trees, fields and trails in the midst of a suburb or city. This open space is not necessarily of stunning beauty, but it serves as the "green heart" of a community. The open space helps to bring people in different neighborhoods together for hiking or picnicking or walking to another part of the community. The land serves as a buffer zone separating residential and commercial areas, and as a transit corridor between residential neighborhoods and recreational areas. It also enhances the property values in the residential areas.
When politicians say they support open space, which vision do they advocate? The easy answer is to say "all types of open space." The reality is that money, resources and undeveloped land are scarce. There is not enough to go around. It is easy to support open space when no one else wants the land anyway or when opportunity costs are low.
The true test is whether politicians ever say NO to development. Another test is whether politicians take a leadership role and develop proactive strategies to protect open spaces before they are directly attacked. This involves building coalitions with land owners, environmental groups, local businesses, and governments. That politician is a true supporter of open space.
